Cosmetic surgery to reduce the masculine appearance of the “Adam’s apple” has a high patient satisfaction rate, according to a study in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open, the official open-access medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).
But plastic surgeons performing this procedure must balance the cosmetic results against the need for caution to prevent irreversible voice changes, according to the outcomes study by Jeffrey H. Spiegel, MD, and colleagues of Boston University Medical Center. Their study presents a new questionnaire for use in assessing the cosmetic outcomes and quality-of-life impact of Adam’s apple reduction surgery in transgender and other patients.
Alan Matarasso, MD, Clinical Professor of Surgery at Northwell Health System/Hofstra University, Zuckerman School of Medicine and a private practice plastic surgeon based in New York City, was named president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the world’s largest organization of board-certified plastic surgeons. Dr. Matarasso took office at Plastic Surgery The Meeting, the Society’s annual scientific meeting, in Chicago and will serve for one year.
“I am honored to lead the world’s largest organization of board-certified plastic surgeons,” Matarasso notes, in a media release. “As President, I will ensure that ASPS continues to advocate for patient safety and provide members with practice support, educational opportunities and resources to ensure we advance and improve the quality of care for plastic surgery patients.”
Thousands of US women with FDA-approved silicone gel implants do not realize their implants have ruptured, according to cross-referenced data from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) and silicone gel implant rupture rates monitored by the FDA.
As an MRI is recommended by FDA after the first 3 years then every two years to detect silicone gel implant rupture, conservative estimates point to over 150,000 women across the country living daily with “silent rupture”— and sticky silicone gel in contact with their tissues.
“Replacing ruptured silicone gel implants has been a very common surgery for plastic surgeons, due to the rates of rupture and capsule contracture,” explains Newport Beach Plastic Surgeon Larry Nichter, in a media release.
“This is driving demand for new technology advancements like the structured IDEAL IMPLANT. It’s internal baffling structure provides a similar natural look and feel to silicone gel implants, it has a very low rupture risk, easy rupture detection by looking at the breast, and only saline coming into contact with body tissue if the implant shell is compromised. So it’s clear why more women are choosing this third option.”
ASPS reports that 4.93% of the 158.3 million women in the United States have undergone breast augmentation surgery. As the top cosmetic surgery procedure in the US for over a decade, according to the release, procedures are up 40% since 2000, with over half of patients choosing silicone gel or “gummy bear” implants since the FDA allowed them back on the market in 2006. With rupture risk ranging from 8.7% to 24.2% over 10 years, and no way to easily detect rupture without a potentially costly MRI, tens of thousands of women with ruptured silicone gel implants are unaware of what is happening inside their body.
Even if many women are in the dark about whether their silicone gel implants are intact, this doesn’t mean they aren’t worried. According to survey results of 1,143 women presented at the March 2018 ASPS meeting, 97% said they would want to know if their silicone gel implants were ruptured, with 95% wanting the faulty implant replaced, even if it was not causing symptoms. Anxiety about potential rupture also ran high, with most women reporting they would be “very” or “constantly” concerned of silicone gel silent rupture (73%), including 68% of women who already had silicone gel implants, the release continues.
“After years of struggling with ruptured silicone gel implants in my practice and hearing countless patient concerns, I felt women shouldn’t have to choose between the natural look and feel of a silicone gel implant and the peace of mind of saline in their body,” explains Robert S. Hamas, MD, president and CEO of Ideal Implant, the maker of the IDEAL IMPLANT Structured Breast Implant approved by both FDA and Health Canada in 2014.
“We all expect technology advancements in every aspect of our lives, and it was time to develop a third option that provided the benefits of both of the earlier implant choices without the drawbacks—truly an ideal solution.”
For more information, visit IDEAL IMPLANT.
[Source: IDEAL Implant]
Gluteal fat grafting, more commonly referred to as the popular Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) procedure, has resulted in an alarming rate of mortality, estimated to be as high as 1:3,000, a rate of death far greater than any other cosmetic surgery.
In response to these unusually high figures, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, International Society of Plastic Regenerative Surgeons and the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science, formed the Task Force for Safety in Gluteal Fat Grafting with the goal of conducting studies to develop specific safety guidelines. The task force, which represents plastic surgeons worldwide who are board-certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS), issued an advisory to surgeons this week, urging discussion of these risks with patients and providing additional recommendations for the safe performance of the procedure.
In search of a cosmetic surgery procedure that might be less costly than the going rate in the United States, a 43-year-old woman traveled to the Dominican Republic for a “tummy tuck.”
What she got, instead, were massive open sores and an antibiotic-resistant infection that ultimately left her with a deformed abdomen.
And hers is a story far from unique.